And no, I’m not talking about the TV station. Well, maybe it does, but that’s guilt by association.
No, I’m talking about Microsoft Windows Small Business Server (SBS.) Look, truth be told, it exasperates me, much like Microsoft Access exasperates me. And no, this is no mere Microsoft-bashing. Why, I love SQL Server. I love Visual Studio.
The truth is both SBS and Access are accessible to inexperienced consultants and then others – ie me
– have to come in and tidy it up when the system inevitably scales beyond what those systems permit.
I wrote a piece on iTWire, “How Linux is keeping Microsoft honest (and why SBS sucks.)” The point wasn’t even really to criticse SBS as such but to show that Windows has been bolstered as a result of the rise of Linux. This is a good thing, competition sharpens vendors. One example is PowerShell – after years of Linux being derided for keeping the real power at the command line instead of a GUI we see Microsoft doing the same thing. I don’t doubt PowerShell was influenced by the BASH shell.
Nevertheless, it was my comments about SBS that drew the most attention from bloggers worldwide. I got a lot of responses. The SBS consultants did themselves no favours; after all they agreed SBS doesn’t let you have trust relationships, you’re limited to one SBS server, you can’t run terminal services on your SBS machine, your user numbers are capped, you’re stuck with 4GB RAM and so on.
What was most interesting though was a Microsoft SBS MVP gave me the real reason why consultants advocate SBS – and it was nothing to do with technology (or price for that matter.)