<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Access must die</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alivad.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alivad.com/?p=325</link>
	<description>Code, databases, gadgets, words and a geek cornucopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:44:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrie Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.alivad.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrie Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alivad.com/?p=325#comment-784</guid>
		<description>PostgreSQL FTW !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PostgreSQL FTW !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rost</title>
		<link>http://www.alivad.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alivad.com/?p=325#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Access is fine... but people have to remember to SCALE IT UP when the project gets too big. You can&#039;t run an Access database alone for something that 20 or 30 people are using all day long. You need to scale it up to run the back-end on SQL Server or something comparable... but Access is perfectly fine for the front-end, even on large projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Access is fine&#8230; but people have to remember to SCALE IT UP when the project gets too big. You can&#8217;t run an Access database alone for something that 20 or 30 people are using all day long. You need to scale it up to run the back-end on SQL Server or something comparable&#8230; but Access is perfectly fine for the front-end, even on large projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.alivad.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 02:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alivad.com/?p=325#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s so accessable. 

I&#039;ve seen it so many times at my old job. Someone gets asked to make something so they can track  &quot;Only one or two people will use it&quot;. 6 months later, there&#039;s 10 people using it, and it&#039;s tracking a bunch of things. another 12 months later and they&#039;re running multi million dollar projects out of this thing and Access is losing data left right and centre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s so accessable. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen it so many times at my old job. Someone gets asked to make something so they can track  &#8220;Only one or two people will use it&#8221;. 6 months later, there&#8217;s 10 people using it, and it&#8217;s tracking a bunch of things. another 12 months later and they&#8217;re running multi million dollar projects out of this thing and Access is losing data left right and centre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
